<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Website Design Meeting with Inertia</title> <atom:link href="http://pinotblogger.com/2006/06/21/website-design-meeting-with-inertia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2006/06/21/website-design-meeting-with-inertia/</link> <description>A blog about starting and building a family winery in the Russian River Valley.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:58:42 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: pinotblogger: the Capozzi Winery blog &#187; UPDATED American Market for Wine - OIV Day 2</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2006/06/21/website-design-meeting-with-inertia/comment-page-1/#comment-1153</link> <dc:creator>pinotblogger: the Capozzi Winery blog &#187; UPDATED American Market for Wine - OIV Day 2</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 06:20:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/?p=102#comment-1153</guid> <description>[...] Both Core and Marginal wine drinkers think wine makes a good gift (something Paul at Inertia has been way out in front of - check out his comments here on the subject), that moderate use is good for you and that you can buy good wine without spending a lot. Where they differ is: [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Both Core and Marginal wine drinkers think wine makes a good gift (something Paul at Inertia has been way out in front of &#8211; check out his comments here on the subject), that moderate use is good for you and that you can buy good wine without spending a lot. Where they differ is: [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Josh</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2006/06/21/website-design-meeting-with-inertia/comment-page-1/#comment-1036</link> <dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:04:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/?p=102#comment-1036</guid> <description>Paul,Thanks for the detailed explanation. I hadn&#039;t considered gifting to the extent that you have, and if the various tax laws and compliance regulations prevent accurate final pricing even with a single screen cart, then the benefit of having one goes out the window.Your arguments make good sense, and given your extensive research on the subject, your Kung Fu is clearly stronger than mine. :)Thanks again. I&#039;m looking forward to talking with Dan on Thursday.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p><p>Thanks for the detailed explanation. I hadn&#8217;t considered gifting to the extent that you have, and if the various tax laws and compliance regulations prevent accurate final pricing even with a single screen cart, then the benefit of having one goes out the window.</p><p>Your arguments make good sense, and given your extensive research on the subject, your Kung Fu is clearly stronger than mine. <img src='http://pinotblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Thanks again. I&#8217;m looking forward to talking with Dan on Thursday.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul Mabray</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2006/06/21/website-design-meeting-with-inertia/comment-page-1/#comment-1026</link> <dc:creator>Paul Mabray</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:53:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/?p=102#comment-1026</guid> <description>Again, great comments - we actually tested single screen carts quite frequently (though they have only become mainstream, we have been testing them since our incarnation as well as our close relations with people at Amazon who do not use that technology)The major issues for carts is false expectations mostly revolving around gifting and mulitple ship to (how can you calculate shipping or if someone can ship to by the first address?) which will be a major component of online wine sales in the next 5 years (gifting that is) and other &quot;calculators&quot; which need to be determined AFTER all the information for the purchase is provided.  With the wine industry&#039;s compliance restrictions, varying tax laws (and interpetations of), unusual shipping components, really confuse running carts and do not reflect ACCURATE FINAL pricing until the end thus (again) causing consumer confusion on pricing and customer dissatisfaction.  Additionally, most single screen carts do a filtration method BEFORE you have the customers information reducing the ability to capture that potential customer AND distilling your product selection to only what is available in that state.  As an example, note the different selections that wine.com presents when choosing a state.  From a winery&#039;s point of view, you want ALL products to display in that state, even if they are not available for marketing purposes.Also if you deter the customer from giving his information by distilling them before they give it to you, you very much eliminate the ability to form some sort of relationship.  For example, though you many not ship to UT, you do want to communicate your brand message to UT customers( e.g. f you are at the Sundance Film Film Festival pouring, you want their names to tell them to come and visit).  Having them choose their states first, reduces their interest in signing up with you.  Hope this helps.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, great comments &#8211; we actually tested single screen carts quite frequently (though they have only become mainstream, we have been testing them since our incarnation as well as our close relations with people at Amazon who do not use that technology)</p><p>The major issues for carts is false expectations mostly revolving around gifting and mulitple ship to (how can you calculate shipping or if someone can ship to by the first address?) which will be a major component of online wine sales in the next 5 years (gifting that is) and other &#8220;calculators&#8221; which need to be determined AFTER all the information for the purchase is provided.  With the wine industry&#8217;s compliance restrictions, varying tax laws (and interpetations of), unusual shipping components, really confuse running carts and do not reflect ACCURATE FINAL pricing until the end thus (again) causing consumer confusion on pricing and customer dissatisfaction.  Additionally, most single screen carts do a filtration method BEFORE you have the customers information reducing the ability to capture that potential customer AND distilling your product selection to only what is available in that state.  As an example, note the different selections that wine.com presents when choosing a state.  From a winery&#8217;s point of view, you want ALL products to display in that state, even if they are not available for marketing purposes.</p><p>Also if you deter the customer from giving his information by distilling them before they give it to you, you very much eliminate the ability to form some sort of relationship.  For example, though you many not ship to UT, you do want to communicate your brand message to UT customers( e.g. f you are at the Sundance Film Film Festival pouring, you want their names to tell them to come and visit).  Having them choose their states first, reduces their interest in signing up with you.  Hope this helps.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Josh</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2006/06/21/website-design-meeting-with-inertia/comment-page-1/#comment-1023</link> <dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 05:17:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/?p=102#comment-1023</guid> <description>Paul,Thanks for the comments and for explaining your position better! I&#039;m very happy that RSS will be an integral part of your architecture. Many cool possibilities there.I&#039;m curious: what problems single do screen/running total carts create, and how can they deter customers from building a relationship with the winery? That will certainly be a question I&#039;ll be asking Dan when we meet next.And while I appreciate that Inertia has done years of studies, single screen carts have only just recently been widely deployed, and any research or testing that doesn&#039;t include one really doesn&#039;t provide evidence for or against the things I argue above.Again, thanks for the comments and I look forward to continuing the conversation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p><p>Thanks for the comments and for explaining your position better! I&#8217;m very happy that RSS will be an integral part of your architecture. Many cool possibilities there.</p><p>I&#8217;m curious: what problems single do screen/running total carts create, and how can they deter customers from building a relationship with the winery? That will certainly be a question I&#8217;ll be asking Dan when we meet next.</p><p>And while I appreciate that Inertia has done years of studies, single screen carts have only just recently been widely deployed, and any research or testing that doesn&#8217;t include one really doesn&#8217;t provide evidence for or against the things I argue above.</p><p>Again, thanks for the comments and I look forward to continuing the conversation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul Mabray</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2006/06/21/website-design-meeting-with-inertia/comment-page-1/#comment-1021</link> <dc:creator>Paul Mabray</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:15:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/?p=102#comment-1021</guid> <description>Thanks for the great comments - we are using AJAX and other technologies but made some very conscious efforts about our new cart and its functionality.  Most of the new UI is base around 100,000&#039;s of users and how they like to look at the cart and how they view a shopping path.  To ensure we get best usability, we have really measured how they like to shop and even done focus groups and many dropped cart analysis.  &quot;Running total carts&quot; in the wine industry pose many, many problems and in fact, can deter customers from trying to create a relationship with your winery.  We have done 4 years of study and tested three beta carts as well as our running cart from the WineShopper.com days and friends at Amazon.com to get our knowledge.  Also, running carts are ineffective for gifts and multiple ship to requests (example: sending wine to two members of your family in two areas of the US).  Finally, the &quot;filtration&quot; cart method of choosing your state prior to shopping has inherent problems in presenting an accurate product selection.  We will continue to add and enhance to the newest technologies while still taking cues from all of our wineries and thier customers.As to RSS - WE LOVE IT and our whole architecture and next release completely expose your store (if you choose) to the entire internet.  We love wineries broadcasting their information to the web in the most efficient and effective ways.We very much enjoy your wine, and hope you&#039;ll join our REthink family and if you ever have any questions - please feel free to contact me or Dan anytime.---Paul Mabray - CEO Inertia - Powering the Wine Revolution</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great comments &#8211; we are using AJAX and other technologies but made some very conscious efforts about our new cart and its functionality.  Most of the new UI is base around 100,000&#8242;s of users and how they like to look at the cart and how they view a shopping path.  To ensure we get best usability, we have really measured how they like to shop and even done focus groups and many dropped cart analysis.  &#8220;Running total carts&#8221; in the wine industry pose many, many problems and in fact, can deter customers from trying to create a relationship with your winery.  We have done 4 years of study and tested three beta carts as well as our running cart from the WineShopper.com days and friends at Amazon.com to get our knowledge.  Also, running carts are ineffective for gifts and multiple ship to requests (example: sending wine to two members of your family in two areas of the US).  Finally, the &#8220;filtration&#8221; cart method of choosing your state prior to shopping has inherent problems in presenting an accurate product selection.  We will continue to add and enhance to the newest technologies while still taking cues from all of our wineries and thier customers.</p><p>As to RSS &#8211; WE LOVE IT and our whole architecture and next release completely expose your store (if you choose) to the entire internet.  We love wineries broadcasting their information to the web in the most efficient and effective ways.</p><p>We very much enjoy your wine, and hope you&#8217;ll join our REthink family and if you ever have any questions &#8211; please feel free to contact me or Dan anytime.</p><p>&#8212;Paul Mabray &#8211; CEO<br /> Inertia &#8211; Powering the Wine Revolution</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: pinotblogger.com @ 2012-02-08 16:56:41 -->
