<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Veraison Is Here</title> <atom:link href="http://pinotblogger.com/2006/08/02/veraison-is-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2006/08/02/veraison-is-here/</link> <description>A blog about starting and building a family winery in the Russian River Valley.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:58:42 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2006/08/02/veraison-is-here/comment-page-1/#comment-1473</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 22:20:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/2006/08/02/veraison-is-here/#comment-1473</guid> <description>Ahh, random sampling would be too hard in this case...perhaps you could get the same 67 people drunk first?  You&#039;d get some random results then!  *)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, random sampling would be too hard in this case&#8230;perhaps you could get the same 67 people drunk first?  You&#8217;d get some random results then!  *)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Josh</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2006/08/02/veraison-is-here/comment-page-1/#comment-1423</link> <dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 04:46:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/2006/08/02/veraison-is-here/#comment-1423</guid> <description>Alex,You\&#039;re right, assuming that my sample is truly random. Unfortunately my sample is almost assuredly NOT random. Good enough for me though.We\&#039;re up to 67 now and the percentages aren\&#039;t changing too much: 21 is up to 37.3%.If the relative percentages hold up though I\&#039;m more than willing to act on them. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex,</p><p>You\&#8217;re right, assuming that my sample is truly random. Unfortunately my sample is almost assuredly NOT random. Good enough for me though.</p><p>We\&#8217;re up to 67 now and the percentages aren\&#8217;t changing too much: 21 is up to 37.3%.</p><p>If the relative percentages hold up though I\&#8217;m more than willing to act on them. <img src='http://pinotblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2006/08/02/veraison-is-here/comment-page-1/#comment-1422</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 04:20:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/2006/08/02/veraison-is-here/#comment-1422</guid> <description>So, is it 11 people each for labels 23 and 76, 12 people for label 32, and 17 people for label 21?  That&#039;s actually a pretty good turnout, I&#039;d say!  And, 50 people is enough for a legitimate sample size...although I doubt there&#039;s a significant difference in preference between 21 and the other labels.  *)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, is it 11 people each for labels 23 and 76, 12 people for label 32, and 17 people for label 21?  That&#8217;s actually a pretty good turnout, I&#8217;d say!  And, 50 people is enough for a legitimate sample size&#8230;although I doubt there&#8217;s a significant difference in preference between 21 and the other labels.  *)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: pinotblogger.com @ 2012-02-08 03:05:39 -->
