<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: American Wine Critics Are Parasites</title> <atom:link href="http://pinotblogger.com/2008/06/17/american-wine-critics-are-parasites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2008/06/17/american-wine-critics-are-parasites/</link> <description>A blog about starting and building a family winery in the Russian River Valley.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:58:42 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: cryptologic 21 bj strategy</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2008/06/17/american-wine-critics-are-parasites/comment-page-1/#comment-164782</link> <dc:creator>cryptologic 21 bj strategy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:34:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/?p=391#comment-164782</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;cryptologic 21 bj strategy...&lt;/strong&gt;stylishness sacrificers Barbados Zionist reconciliation assistantships ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>cryptologic 21 bj strategy&#8230;</strong></p><p>stylishness sacrificers Barbados Zionist reconciliation assistantships &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pocher 7 card stud cheater</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2008/06/17/american-wine-critics-are-parasites/comment-page-1/#comment-152329</link> <dc:creator>pocher 7 card stud cheater</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:00:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/?p=391#comment-152329</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;pocher 7 card stud cheater...&lt;/strong&gt;fluoresce skinners determinacy bridegroom ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>pocher 7 card stud cheater&#8230;</strong></p><p>fluoresce skinners determinacy bridegroom &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: car insurance utica new york</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2008/06/17/american-wine-critics-are-parasites/comment-page-1/#comment-130412</link> <dc:creator>car insurance utica new york</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:59:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/?p=391#comment-130412</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;car insurance utica new york...&lt;/strong&gt;emaciated kiddie wordiness transporter Veganism daemons:...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>car insurance utica new york&#8230;</strong></p><p>emaciated kiddie wordiness transporter Veganism daemons:&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Context: The Keystone of Wine Education</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2008/06/17/american-wine-critics-are-parasites/comment-page-1/#comment-110868</link> <dc:creator>Context: The Keystone of Wine Education</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:59:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/?p=391#comment-110868</guid> <description>[...] made a pretty impassioned plea a couple posts back arguing that educating consumers is the key to driving demand for wine. Sounds [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] made a pretty impassioned plea a couple posts back arguing that educating consumers is the key to driving demand for wine. Sounds [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Josh Hermsmeyer</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2008/06/17/american-wine-critics-are-parasites/comment-page-1/#comment-110077</link> <dc:creator>Josh Hermsmeyer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:48:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/?p=391#comment-110077</guid> <description>epicuria and Dr. Horowitz,Points well taken! People should be allowed to be controversial to sell books. But controversial DOES NOT equal credible. And that&#039;s the entire point.If you are going to base the sales of your book on unsubtle, &quot;look at me&quot; marketing, then isn&#039;t it disingenuous to at the same time criticize winemakers for making unsubtle &quot;look at me wines&quot;?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>epicuria and Dr. Horowitz,</p><p>Points well taken! People should be allowed to be controversial to sell books. But controversial DOES NOT equal credible. And that&#8217;s the entire point.</p><p>If you are going to base the sales of your book on unsubtle, &#8220;look at me&#8221; marketing, then isn&#8217;t it disingenuous to at the same time criticize winemakers for making unsubtle &#8220;look at me wines&#8221;?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dr. Horowitz</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2008/06/17/american-wine-critics-are-parasites/comment-page-1/#comment-110076</link> <dc:creator>Dr. Horowitz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:43:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/?p=391#comment-110076</guid> <description>This might sound bad, but oh well.  There was a Daily Show episode a few years ago when things started getting bad in Iraq and the Pentagon accused the media of being overly negative and not focusing on the positives in Iraq.  John Stewart said something like &quot;the media never focuses on the bus that didn&#039;t get bombed.&quot;  Sorry, I forgot the punch line, but I guess my point is that if you don&#039;t ruffle some feathers, you are less likely to get blogged about and to get other PR.  That said, I just started reading Wine Politics and don&#039;t intend to read Fearing&#039;s book whose title I am too lazy to type.I agree that the high road is to educate, but a lot of people, Mooks, and Midriffs just don&#039;t want to be educated... (for more on Mooks see http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/cool/).  Education is not part of cool, and cool sells.Finally, to Orion Slayer... Gary Vaynerchuk is the champion of teaching you to shop at the Wine Library, where you can always find something new you haven&#039;t tried.  Gary is very entertaining.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might sound bad, but oh well.  There was a Daily Show episode a few years ago when things started getting bad in Iraq and the Pentagon accused the media of being overly negative and not focusing on the positives in Iraq.  John Stewart said something like &#8220;the media never focuses on the bus that didn&#8217;t get bombed.&#8221;  Sorry, I forgot the punch line, but I guess my point is that if you don&#8217;t ruffle some feathers, you are less likely to get blogged about and to get other PR.  That said, I just started reading Wine Politics and don&#8217;t intend to read Fearing&#8217;s book whose title I am too lazy to type.</p><p>I agree that the high road is to educate, but a lot of people, Mooks, and Midriffs just don&#8217;t want to be educated&#8230; (for more on Mooks see <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/cool/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/cool/</a>).  Education is not part of cool, and cool sells.</p><p>Finally, to Orion Slayer&#8230; Gary Vaynerchuk is the champion of teaching you to shop at the Wine Library, where you can always find something new you haven&#8217;t tried.  Gary is very entertaining.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Cole</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2008/06/17/american-wine-critics-are-parasites/comment-page-1/#comment-109801</link> <dc:creator>David Cole</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:45:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/?p=391#comment-109801</guid> <description>Good read.  Your right, she is acting no different about selling her book than us wine folks do to sell our wines.  The difference is when our wines get a bad score or are given critical write ups, it turns folks off and we lose sales.  When someone talks bad about her or her book, it creates publicity and that sells books!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good read.  Your right, she is acting no different about selling her book than us wine folks do to sell our wines.  The difference is when our wines get a bad score or are given critical write ups, it turns folks off and we lose sales.  When someone talks bad about her or her book, it creates publicity and that sells books!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: epicuria</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2008/06/17/american-wine-critics-are-parasites/comment-page-1/#comment-109449</link> <dc:creator>epicuria</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 23:37:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/?p=391#comment-109449</guid> <description>You&#039;re too level headed, Josh.  I think a case can be made that confronting a major force in any field (trying to kill the giant) is much more interesting to the reading public than, in this instance, describing why elegance or finesse are more or as important in winemaking.  She&#039;s got to sell those books as several folks noted.  But indirectly she &lt;strong&gt;is&lt;/strong&gt; supporting those vintners who are succeeding in controlling the New World weather and other components of terroir that ramp up those wines.The much more interesting question to me is how someone like John Alban, for example, can create so much intensity and richness without ever going over the top.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re too level headed, Josh.  I think a case can be made that confronting a major force in any field (trying to kill the giant) is much more interesting to the reading public than, in this instance, describing why elegance or finesse are more or as important in winemaking.  She&#8217;s got to sell those books as several folks noted.  But indirectly she <strong>is</strong> supporting those vintners who are succeeding in controlling the New World weather and other components of terroir that ramp up those wines.</p><p>The much more interesting question to me is how someone like John Alban, for example, can create so much intensity and richness without ever going over the top.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Orion Slayer</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2008/06/17/american-wine-critics-are-parasites/comment-page-1/#comment-109175</link> <dc:creator>Orion Slayer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:18:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/?p=391#comment-109175</guid> <description>Great post.  So much information and food for thought in one article!  I think we could all do with being more open about wine.  I think Gary Vaynerchuk is the champion for trying all kinds of wines and not being closed off to any particular style.  We could all enjoy wine much better with that attitude.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  So much information and food for thought in one article!  I think we could all do with being more open about wine.  I think Gary Vaynerchuk is the champion for trying all kinds of wines and not being closed off to any particular style.  We could all enjoy wine much better with that attitude.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Craig Camp</title><link>http://pinotblogger.com/2008/06/17/american-wine-critics-are-parasites/comment-page-1/#comment-109052</link> <dc:creator>Craig Camp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:32:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/?p=391#comment-109052</guid> <description>&lt;em&gt;Thatâ€™s the basic question I had for Alice. So, when I asked her if she regretted writing the infamous LA Times piece, I was surprised at her response.â€œNo,â€ she answered, and gave as her grounds the reasoning that it was good marketing for her book and for her message. â€œIt got people talking,â€ she said.&lt;/em&gt;That just blows me away. I speechless. If she said that it undermines her entire credibility.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Thatâ€™s the basic question I had for Alice. So, when I asked her if she regretted writing the infamous LA Times piece, I was surprised at her response.</p><p>â€œNo,â€ she answered, and gave as her grounds the reasoning that it was good marketing for her book and for her message. â€œIt got people talking,â€ she said.</em></p><p>That just blows me away. I speechless. If she said that it undermines her entire credibility.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using memcached

Served from: pinotblogger.com @ 2012-05-22 13:03:56 -->
