<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Natural Wine and Cowardly Wineries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pinotblogger.com/2010/10/21/natural-wine-and-cowardly-wineries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pinotblogger.com/2010/10/21/natural-wine-and-cowardly-wineries/</link>
	<description>A blog about starting and building a family winery in the Russian River Valley.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:58:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kelly</title>
		<link>http://pinotblogger.com/2010/10/21/natural-wine-and-cowardly-wineries/comment-page-1/#comment-251908</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinotblogger.com/?p=1660#comment-251908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Josh - I won&#039;t deign to make wines just to get the attention of reviewers, retailers, brokers and distributors who base their trade on the &quot;natural&quot; myth - any more than I would make an over-ripe, over-extracted, over-oaked, high-pH bretty fruit bomb to appeal to other reviewers, or produce wines deliberately at under 14% alcohol to satisfy the requirements of certain buyers. Heck, I&#039;m just a contrarian all over. 

I&#039;m actually surprised that Ch. Ste. Michelle is officially neutral on I-1100 - behind closed doors they must be against it; if not they are idiots and I doubt they are. The strength of their brand is in their size, their wide and deep wholesaler relationships, and their command of shelf space and low- to mid-tier wine lists. Anything that levels the playing field for the smaller producers is not in Ch. Ste. Michelle&#039;s interests. 

OK so Lincecum just managed 3-up 3-down in the first inning, so back to the game. Where&#039;s my beer?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh &#8211; I won&#8217;t deign to make wines just to get the attention of reviewers, retailers, brokers and distributors who base their trade on the &#8220;natural&#8221; myth &#8211; any more than I would make an over-ripe, over-extracted, over-oaked, high-pH bretty fruit bomb to appeal to other reviewers, or produce wines deliberately at under 14% alcohol to satisfy the requirements of certain buyers. Heck, I&#8217;m just a contrarian all over. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m actually surprised that Ch. Ste. Michelle is officially neutral on I-1100 &#8211; behind closed doors they must be against it; if not they are idiots and I doubt they are. The strength of their brand is in their size, their wide and deep wholesaler relationships, and their command of shelf space and low- to mid-tier wine lists. Anything that levels the playing field for the smaller producers is not in Ch. Ste. Michelle&#8217;s interests. </p>
<p>OK so Lincecum just managed 3-up 3-down in the first inning, so back to the game. Where&#8217;s my beer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached

 Served from: pinotblogger.com @ 2013-05-21 08:56:25 by W3 Total Cache -->